SD, SEM, SED or CI … Which One Should I Report?

The blog title, "SD, SEM, SED or CI … Which one should I report?" set across a blue background with an image of data on a computer screen

When presenting results from your experiment, such as treatment means, it is best practice to provide a measure of uncertainty, such as a standard error or a confidence interval (CI). However, a commonly asked is what should be reported: the SD, SEM, SED, or a CI for the mean or the difference between means.

It may seem like a small thing, but presenting an appropriate metric makes a difference to how your results are interpreted. Let’s discover why!

Importantly, each quantity describes something different. In a nutshell:

  • The standard deviation (SD) describes the variability in the raw data.
  • The standard error of the mean (SEM) describes how precisely a single treatment mean has been estimated.
  • The standard error of a difference (SED) describes how precisely two treatment means can be compared.
  • A confidence interval for a mean provides a range of plausible values for an individual treatment mean.
  • A confidence interval for a difference provides a range of plausible values for the difference between two treatment means.

Consequently, in practice, these quantities answer different questions:

  • The SD is useful for understanding the spread of the data, but it does not reflect uncertainty in treatment means.
  • The SEM, or CI for the mean, is appropriate when describing the precision of individual means, but it does not directly inform comparisons between treatments.
  • The SED, or CI for the difference, is appropriate when the focus is on the difference between a pair of treatment means.

This leads to a simple rule of thumb:

  • If you are describing the data, report the SD. 
  • If you are describing individual treatment means, report the SEM or CI for the mean. 
  • If you are comparing treatments, report the SED or CI for the difference.

Related blogs

Further inference from an ANOVA table: residual variance to standard errors and confidence intervals

The power of confidence intervals: beyond p-values

Presenting Results with Integrity: Designing a Good Table

Presenting Results with Integrity: Designing a Good Graph

Picture of Dr. Vanessa Cave
Dr. Vanessa Cave
Dr. Vanessa Cave is an applied statistician interested in the application of statistics to the biosciences, in particular agriculture and ecology, and is a developer of the Genstat statistical software package. She has over 15 years of experience collaborating with scientists, using statistics to solve real-world problems. Vanessa provides expertise on experiment and survey design, data collection and management, statistical analysis, and the interpretation of statistical findings. Her interests include statistical consultancy, mixed models, multivariate methods, statistical ecology, statistical graphics and data visualisation, and the statistical challenges related to digital agriculture. Vanessa is a past President of both the Australasian Region of the International Biometric Society and the New Zealand Statistical Association, on the Editorial Board of The New Zealand Veterinary Journal and an honorary academic at the University of Auckland. She has a PhD in statistics from the University of St Andrew.

Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related articles

A genotype that leads one trial can lose its advantage in the next, even when trials sit within...
Experimental and observational studies can both provide valuable insights, but they answer different kinds of questions. This article...
Spatial variation can affect comparisons between varieties or treatments in field trials, but there is no single model...